Search
  • Zina

Nike Logos and the 4th of July

This article resonates: https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-declaration-of-independence-unites-and-divides-us-11562232601?fbclid=IwAR0L8hJ4ROwe839WW8ybYjo1AKpe5tKqrJFjrjAphEaxIhPLM86NdsdI1mY


"Our shared commitment to wrestle with the Declaration and the Constitution has always been a large part [of] what it means to be American."


I love that the author uses the word "wrestle". That is truly what we do. Each generation must wrestle with our own ideals to make this a more perfect Union.


I think Nike logos are a frivolous issue, for example. But they seem to matter to another generation. I will, therefore, wrestle.


As recently as my mother's storied career as a TWU Pioneer Woman, a brilliant chemist worked in the home economics field because it was recommended as "more appropriate".


I find Nike's Betsy Ross flag logo offensive because it implies that the only female contribution to our liberty was to sew a flag.


Most who know me and who get this far in my post will know this already... This is meant "tongue-in-cheek". But there is usually truth to be found in the "tongue-in-cheek".

Recall what Jefferson once said about the "tree of liberty" and "the blood of patriots and tyrants".


Most of all, I find it profoundly meaningful that on the 243rd anniversary of our Declaration, we are wrestling about logos on sneakers. Some would find that depressing and pessimistic. I don't. How far we have come!


There is indeed much more to do. I will not minimize that by attempting to do it justice in this final paragraph. Leave it at that, "there is much more to do", but meanwhile, yesterday, we celebrated a glorious experiment that began 243 years ago and has been proven and improved upon by each generation. That is cool!

6 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

The story of the Alamo moves me every time I think of it. There can be debate about the justness of the cause. There can be debate about the wisdom of the "line in the sand". There can be debate about